Here is a couple more to share…unfortunately, we are in a field that is on the front line of politics.
The Chicago teacher’s union voting proposition is an example of some of the “institutional stupidity” going on…and one of the most powerful chapters of teachers unions in the country. - they include DIBELS and
AimsWeb in the list- the premise is that tests are racist because black/brown kids can't pass them- from this perspective regarding the social construction of reality- the test creates the deficit rather than showing the need that objectively exists.
Funny quote:
“Districts and school boards use these tests for other purposes: to stratify schools, blame teachers and parents and to categorize as failing the schools in Black and Brown communities that they have deprived
of adequate and equitable resources for decades.”
https://www.ctulocal1.org/rights/concerns/workload/testing/
If they are providing assessment tools like AimsWeb and DIBELS (I am biased because I know the developers for sure),those are at least some of the resources they need…some in the field seem to think that if the
test goes away, somehow, the deficit will also (rather than just being ignored as it usually is or issuing a referral to special education). And then….somehow the union isn’t engaging in bias and discrimination and is off the hook because they refuse to use
or aren't teaching or using the tools to teach kids how to read, which promotes inequity and makes disparity gaps even worse.
And this op ed I shared earlier is quite true and has been an issue for a very long time…hopefully something some of you can help us figure out.
“According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a sector of the U.S. Department of Education, 84 percent of Black students lack proficiency in mathematics and 85 percent of Black students
lack proficiency in reading skills. This astonished me, and the hour-long show became dedicated to examining what’s behind these numbers.”
Fortunately, the NEA and AFT, despite having some problematic views in other areas I think- seem to be still promoting MTSS. Which is a good thing as they are powerful influencers of education policy.
https://www.nea.org/professional-excellence/student-engagement/tools-tips/mtss-more-alphabet-soup
State tests- they don’t like so much… people have talking about this for a long time- somehow- it is overlooked that if you can’t read, well- you aren’t going to do well on any type of test (so of course they are biased toward people who
can’t read) and somehow, it then gets generalized that black/brown people can’t learn how to read rather than they haven’t been taught how to read, and of course- the kids then come to us in special education- now they have a learning disability (rather than
a curricular disability).
https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/racist-beginnings-standardized-testing
“Many of these same communities have suffered the most from high-stakes testing. Since their inception almost a century ago, the tests have been instruments of racism and a biased system. Decades of research demonstrate that Black, Latin(o/a/x),
and Native students, as well as students from some Asian groups, experience bias from standardized tests administered from early childhood through college.”
You can parallel this conversation in math as well- with the movement to get rid of Algebra for black and brown kids- rather than, well, actually teaching them algebra (I don’t buy into this view that somehow based on skin color one group is less able to learn than another…where many seem to be landing somehow). And somehow, that will help improve disparities in STEM…strange times and recommendations from those that one would least expect it to come from… more for all of you to help us figure out…MDB
Mack D. Burke, Ph.D.
Department of Educational Psychology
Applied Behavior Analysis and Special Education Programs
Behavioral Education & Assessment Research (BEAR Lab)
School of Education, Baylor University