@Elizabeth Tilley Yes, that is correct, and preferable since we are almost always going back and forth within separate proposals. To keep everything distinguishable, the nomenclature should be applied to all documents within the Cayuse record.

Best,

Johnnie Ann Montalvo, MBA
Grant & Contract Administrator III

Office of Sponsored Projects
The University of Texas at San Antonio
One UTSA Circle
San Antonio, TX 78249
O: 210.458.6633
utsa.edu

From: Elizabeth Tilley <elizabeth.tilley@utsa.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:26 PM
To: Rowdy Research (rowdy.research@lists.it.utsa.edu) <rowdy.research@lists.it.utsa.edu>
Subject: [Rowdy.research] Clarification for document nomenclature in Peoplesoft, Supporting Documents

Dear OSP (And All),

Per the preaward SOP, we need to have documents labeled Proposal#_UTSABudget_Final (19861_UTSABudget_Final, for example). Does this also apply to documents such as the RG0101R and RFA/NOFO’s?

I’ve seen it done both ways and want to make sure we are submitting these documents with correct nomenclature.

Please confirm.

Thank you!

Liz

Elizabeth H. Escoto (formerly Tilley), PhD

Sr. Research Administrator

COS College Research Administration Teams

Office of Research

The University of Texas at San Antonio

cell: 347.299.1641

One UTSA Circle
San Antonio, TX 78249-3209