@Elizabeth Tilley<mailto:elizabeth.tilley@utsa.edu> Yes, that is correct, and preferable since we are almost always going back and forth within separate proposals. To keep everything distinguishable, the nomenclature should be applied to all documents within the Cayuse record. Best, Johnnie Ann Montalvo, MBA Grant & Contract Administrator III Office of Sponsored Projects The University of Texas at San Antonio One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249 O: 210.458.6633 utsa.edu [cid:01f98e88-2348-48b1-a1c0-dc8ebc5af9e6] ________________________________ From: Elizabeth Tilley <elizabeth.tilley(a)utsa.edu&gt; Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:26 PM To: Rowdy Research (rowdy.research(a)lists.it.utsa.edu) <rowdy.research(a)lists.it.utsa.edu&gt; Subject: [Rowdy.research] Clarification for document nomenclature in Peoplesoft, Supporting Documents Dear OSP (And All), Per the preaward SOP, we need to have documents labeled Proposal#_UTSABudget_Final (19861_UTSABudget_Final, for example). Does this also apply to documents such as the RG0101R and RFA/NOFO’s? I’ve seen it done both ways and want to make sure we are submitting these documents with correct nomenclature. Please confirm. Thank you! Liz Elizabeth H. Escoto (formerly Tilley), PhD Sr. Research Administrator COS College Research Administration Teams Office of Research The University of Texas at San Antonio cell: 347.299.1641 One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249-3209 ________________________________